The Mechanical Press Doesn't Care Who's Running It
A plant manager told me once that the best day of his career was the day a new hire ran the stamping press at the same rate, with the same scrap rate, as his most senior operator. Nobody asked whose “style” the part reflected. The press doesn't care who's running it. Manufacturing spent decades making sure of that.
Then We Got to the Paperwork
Ask the same plant to grade an 8D, and the answer changes by reviewer. Ask two shifts to evaluate the same corrective action, and you'll get two different verdicts. We call that “judgment” and treat it as something that simply varies — the same way we used to treat scrap rates before poka-yoke and standardized work.
What Standardizing Judgment Looks Like
MAD-Ai applies the discipline manufacturing already trusts for physical work to the analytical side: grading 8Ds, cross-walking PFMEAs against control plans, reviewing PPAP submissions, generating gap reports. Same standard, every time, regardless of who's available that week or how many are in the queue.
The Engineer Still Decides
This isn't about taking judgment out of the room. It's about making sure the work in front of the engineer — the file, the evidence, the gap analysis — was assembled to the same standard every time, so their judgment is being applied to a consistent starting point instead of whatever got rushed together before the shift ended.
Want to see how it holds up on your own documents? Book a demo: mad-ai.com/book-a-demo
Comments